View Full Version : U.S Sanctions Against Iran
ReggaetonInc
17th-November-2007, 04:55 PM
so what i've been hearing is that USA want sanctions on Iran and Russia and China already pulled out causing more Tension. So the only ones left are France, Britain and USA, and new country now Germany.
But China already has problems with USA cause they gave the Dalai Llama a award, their selling almost half or more of USA currency off, ect.
Russia and USA have been going at it for so long, first bush wanted missle defence system right at the doorsteps of Russia and Putin was outraged and said if they did that he'll launch all the Nuclear Weapons at Europe.
Right now if USA invades Iran, Russia would go in action very quickly, and China following in aswell.
What do you think of the outcome that would bring?
Alex
17th-November-2007, 05:00 PM
It's World War III worthy, as is most things stemming from Russia.
They love to threaten, and they have little fear.
I think that voting a Liberal in office is the only way to deescalate the situation, and end it.
Other wise, I see it going badly.
If Russia doesn't support going into Iran, then we need to back off. USA is struggling to maintain it's superpower status. China and Russia are rising.
Big!
17th-November-2007, 05:03 PM
I told people about 3 years ago that Iran would be next. Look at a map. Afghanistan is on one side, Iraq is on the other. That's no coincidence.
I'm from the U.S., but I don't want any more wars. We're stuck in enough places right now and we'll be paying for the consequences of our actions for generations to come. Bush only has a year and two months left in office and he can't run for reelection. If he's planning on starting another war, it will happen soon. However, our congress controls the purse strings and you can't fight a war without money. I hope wiser minds prevail.
As for the Dalai Llama, he deserves an award, but I'm surprised he accepted it from the warmongers that currently run my country.
Big!
ReggaetonInc
17th-November-2007, 05:03 PM
and China is a Communist country if they have war and want everyone 18+ lol your lookin at a 1 billion man army maybe more lol and with China you basically have North Korea and thy already been testin nuclear weapons but they died down lol
Russia wont support it because its Russia supportin the nuclear fuel for Iran to build its nuclear power plants so they wont support it at all.
Alex
17th-November-2007, 05:04 PM
I think Russia's making a mistake. Iran's too unstable to be supporting.
Oh well. Hopefully they know what they're doing?
Big!
17th-November-2007, 05:08 PM
The fact of the matter is, Russia and China won't do anything. They can't. They recognize the consequences. No leader wants nuclear war. What Russia and China will do, is use a U.S. attack on Iran as an excuse to get their own dirty work done. If you recall Russia cracked down on Chechnya right after the U.S. went into Iraq, and China started testing missiles. With Iran, the only thing that would spur them to action is oil. They don't give a damn about the Iranians, it's all about oil supplies and their fear that the U.S. could gain control over Iran, which supplies them with oil.
Big!
ReggaetonInc
17th-November-2007, 05:10 PM
its Russia.
Thier only doing it to piss off USA so they wouldnt invade with military action cause you know Russia would be so pissed off and go in with its Military too and Iran Military and Iran has a friend called Syria and they will defenitly go in then Britain will help out and then China is going to loaft until a few months after so is France and Germany.
Then China is going to do a surprise attack again then France will go in with Germany then Canada will get involved somehow. then Iraq and so on and so forth.
Big!
17th-November-2007, 05:14 PM
Speaking of Russia, did you see where they paid people to stay home and have sex one day last month so they can increase the population. A country only increases it's population for one of two reasons, more workers or more soldiers.
I think China would use and Iran invasion as an excuse to retake Taiwan.
Big!
ReggaetonInc
19th-November-2007, 11:31 AM
damn i didnt know that ^^
they actually paid them i wish i got that damn haha
but seriously i think if USA ever steps foot in Iran with military action all hell will break loose.
Big!
20th-November-2007, 03:51 AM
All hell broke loose along time ago. Look around.
Big!
V-Dogg
20th-November-2007, 04:16 AM
and China is a Communist country if they have war and want everyone 18+ lol your lookin at a 1 billion man army maybe more lol and with China you basically have North Korea and thy already been testin nuclear
I've heard rumors that TONS of Chinese say that if China goes to war with the US they'll kill themselves before they're forced to fight.
I think that voting a Liberal in office is the only way to deescalate the situation, and end it.
Why should it have to be a liberal? You shouldn't judge a presidential candidate (or a candidate for any election) based on their political party, but rather their political beliefs. Right now Ron Paul is looking like the best candidate for presidency and he's registered as a Republican.
Big!
20th-November-2007, 04:20 AM
Liberal defines a belief system, not a party. There are liberal Republicans, no so many these days, as well as Democrats.
Big!
V-Dogg
20th-November-2007, 04:30 AM
Liberal defines a belief system, not a party. There are liberal Republicans, no so many these days, as well as Democrats.
Big!
This is true.
ReggaetonInc
20th-November-2007, 05:20 AM
yea all hell has already broken loose high gas prices people straving to death
because when the rich wage war its the poor who die
V-Dogg
20th-November-2007, 06:53 AM
yea all hell has already broken loose high gas prices people straving to death
This has been a problem in some way or form for.... An unknown number of centuries.
Big!
21st-November-2007, 03:54 AM
The war in the middle east is just a continuation of problems that have existed for centuries as well.
Big!
ReggaetonInc
21st-November-2007, 08:56 AM
Canadian-sponsored human rights resolution against Iran passes
Last Updated: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 | 12:07 AM ET
CBC News
Iran failed by one vote on Tuesday to stop a Canadian-sponsored UN resolution condemning Iran's "ongoing systematic violations of human rights."
Iran had tried to stop the Canadian draft resolution at the UN General Assembly's human rights committee from moving to a formal vote by introducing a "motion of no action."
While 78 countries voted in support of the no-action motion, 79 voted against and 24 abstained. Afghanistan voted on side with Iran, against Canada.
The resolution ultimately passed the human rights committee by a vote of 72 to 50, with 55 abstentions.
The resolution expresses its "very serious concern" of the "confirmed instances" of torture, stoning as a method of execution and punishment such as flogging and amputations. The resolution is expected to pass when it reaches the General Assembly in early December.
Canadian Ambassador to the UN John McNee told the committee that there has been a "continued deterioration" in protecting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of Iranians.
"This assembly must stand up and respond. We must hold the government of Iran accountable for the continued violation of human rights of its citizens."
Following the death in 2003 of Iranian-Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi, who died while in Iranian custody, Canada has sponsored a yearly resolution condemning Iran's human rights record.
Iran ambassador blasts Canada
The resolution has easily passed in the previous four years. But CBC's Neil Herland, reporting from UN Headquarters in New York, said it came close to being defeated because Iran has since built support among nations like India, South Africa and Afghanistan.
Herland said those countries have become fed up with being criticized for their human rights policies by the West.
In a fiery speech on Tuesday, Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee blasted Canada, saying it is in no position to lecture Iran about human rights because the country has a history of mistreating its own aboriginal people.
But Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, praised the adoption of the resolution.
"Despite the fact that the resolution covers only a fraction of the crimes committed by the mullahs' regime, it shows clearly that the medieval regime does not have merit to be a part of international community and should be isolated."
------------------------------
i guess canada is fucked i nthe war aswel =( i live in toronto i think that would be a very good nuclear target :( im sad
Big!
21st-November-2007, 04:51 PM
Yet, the protection of human rights is the worthiest of causes.
Big!
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.